- Advertisement -

REVIEW | Chris Lilley’s LUNATICS

- Advertisement -

Latest

- Advertisement -

Share

  Lilley as “Jana”, the pet psychic in LUNATICS  Image - Netflix
Lilley as “Jana”, the pet psychic in LUNATICS Image – Netflix

WE COULD BE HEROES landed Chris Lilley deep into Australia’s psyche in 2005.

His deft writing and performance introduced us to J’amie and a raft of other characters that gave us a unique insight into who we were. SUMMER HEIGHTS HIGH built on that, introducing alpha Ja’mie into a new beta setting, and gifting us a full-blown exposition of the drama teacher we’d all had at some stage – the incomparable Mr G.

With this new 10 episode series LUNATICS, delivered internationally on Netflix, what is apparent is Lilley doesn’t have a lot of people saying no to him.

- Advertisement -


As writer, director, producer and star… he really should have.

LUNATICS – at least the primary characters – are deeply flawed micrograbs of the darker parts of our humanity amplified as comedy, though they sadly swing very wide and land squarely in sadness.

Where before Lilley’s characterisations revealed some redeeming features of each of his creations, LUNATICS attempts in its death throes to justify each of the central six’s abhorrence by suggesting that, “If you wanna be weird, be weird. You do you.” It’s not enough, and feels entirely ham-fisted in each of the six’s individual versions of a happy ending.

Perhaps it’s Lilley reassuring himself that the weirdness he imagines can be considered OK because he’s being authentic to that which comes from his creative night terrors.

I laughed really hard at one moment (and only one). A supporting character did something that was very much a step too far for them and the humour was in that character having the wherewith-all to back themselves. It was very well delivered but not worth watching the 9 episodes necessary to get the context and appreciate it.

I might be reading too much into it – it was one of the rare moments Lilley wasn’t on-screen.

- Advertisement -


There’s nothing horrific in the series and that might be a contributing problem. If it was that bad you might expect some controversy. Yes, Lilley inhabits three female character (one quite graphically thanks to some CGI in episode one) so if that’s offensive to you you wouldn’t even have checked in given his history. No, there’s no blackface character in this series – many thought Jana (above image) was another move into controversy however Lilley’s team assures us Jana is white, simply well-tanned.

This is the real problem for this series and its creator—there’s nothing controversial or even remotely interesting about these characters and their individual journeys.

Hackneyed writing and sub-par performance only add to the multitude of sins contained therein.

Given how great some of Lilley’s past creations have been comparison is too hard to avoid. There’s none of the sharpness of Ja’mie or the endearing unawareness of Mr G here; just very, very pale imitations.

Having a 40-something man play a foul-mouthed obese 11-year old isn’t funny.

Neither is a 7 foot 3 Australian girl at an American college who unsurprisingly struggles to make friends yet becomes famous thanks to her YouTube channel.

- Advertisement -


Or a white Zimbabwean lesbian pet psychic whose dog undergoes gender re-assignment surgery.

Similarly neither is a former porn star turned hoarder with severe mental problems enabled by her best friend.

Nor the eldest son in a three generation real estate sales empire who genetically has a massive arse and an incredibly inability to realise he isn’t talented though he persists.

Lilley nearly lands it with an ageing wannabe fashion designer with objectophilia who is obsessed with a cash register to the point of intercourse. Nearly.

The one thing that binds all six together is their complete lack of self-awareness and the Lilley trademark of diminishing others to elevate themselves.

Put simply: it makes all six primary characters completely unlikeable, and when you’re attempting to hold a mirror up to society and reveal the humour and horror in all of us it only leaves you with the latter. Which, as comedy, just isn’t funny.

It’s just lazy.

Instead if Lilley had focused even one of his prize creations and spent the time and energy developing them with a depth and breadth – even a hint of likability – instead of seemingly playing character-trait-grab-bag-bingo… that would have been dope as fuck.

LUNATICS (10 episodes) – available now on Netflix.


- Advertisement -


Know more about this or another Australian media story?

Contact the team anonymously at TV Blackbox

Steve Molk
Steve Molkhttps://tvblackbox.com.au/author-steve-molk/
Steve Molk is sharply focused on the business of TV in Australia across all its formats - FTA broadcast, commercial, subscription, catch up & BVOD. Based on the Central Coast of NSW he's a passionate advocate for Australian-made programming, particularly drama and comedy. He loves podcasting, gaming & watching too much TV. For all media enquiries please call or text 0401-709-405
Comments

7 COMMENTS

  1. I stuck it out through the 10, but none of these characters match up to his earlier portrayals. All in all, not really the best offering from him. Shame – I do like his comedy, but this missed the mark. Wildly.

  2. Shame to have to say it because I loved Heroes and J’aime, but you have made an accurate assessment Steve of why this fails. And it fails miserably, it’s old hat, has no raison d’être, it’s embarrassing and tired. CL has jumped the shark and anyone who is doubling over cracking ribs on this has either not seen him before or is marking time in a vacuum, it’s all so let’s go round this rock. Gavin, ugh, so tired. The shtick of surrounding characters playing it straight around his deluded grotesques used to be novel and amusing, now it’s so tiresome. Becky is painful, painful, painful. One does still admire his ability to slip in and out of the shoes of his creations, but what does that become but also hollow and yawn inducing. And it all looks so exhausting, so much effort, I felt tired watching it for that as well.

  3. It think it matches Summer Heights High, Ja’mie, Jonah from Tonga in terrms of offerings. I disagree with the thoughts below. Love watching it on Netflix. Up to Episode 6 for me. Cannot wait to see the remaining episodes.

  4. You’re a grumpy old man Steve. I loved it. Favourite characters were Jana and Keith; Leena played the smart wife of Keith really well; who played the disabled heir to the English estate? He acted very well too. I didn’t like the character Becky much; I think Chris could have left that one out.

    • Just because I didn’t like it I’m grumpy, Louise? I really wanted to like it…

  5. I agree, more character development would have helped the series – However, I can’t think of a comedian that inhabits his characters as well as Chris. He’s hilarious. To reviewers that treat his characters literally (looking at you the guardian), I shake my head – The world could do with less indignant wowsers.

Comments are closed.

Join or social media

- Advertisement -

Podcasts

You can't handle the truth, and neither can we, but that doesn't stop the speculation...with special guest Unmade's Tim Burrowes | S09E12

Latest Stories

Advertisement